Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Kansas
(Rep. Steve Watkins)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,888
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $50,229,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Epler Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $117,275 |
42 | Ryan M Patton | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $117,030 |
43 | Jason Troike | Girard, KS 66743 | $116,508 |
44 | Warren Scott | Scammon, KS 66773 | $115,085 |
45 | C Lloyd Crain Living Trust | Columbus, KS 66725 | $114,896 |
46 | Shaffer Agriculture Services LLC | Altamont, KS 67330 | $114,745 |
47 | Getman Brothers Farms LLC | Columbus, KS 66725 | $112,585 |
48 | Kenneth Whelan | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $111,235 |
49 | Christopher Wayne Johnson | Girard, KS 66743 | $110,331 |
50 | Flaharty Farms LLC | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $109,699 |
51 | Burkdoll Brothers Inc | Rantoul, KS 66079 | $109,678 |
52 | Kenneth Murphy | Girard, KS 66743 | $108,113 |
53 | Daryl Drake | Moran, KS 66755 | $106,623 |
54 | Viets Brothers | Girard, KS 66743 | $105,077 |
55 | James L Michael | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $104,622 |
56 | Steve H Shepard | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $104,348 |
57 | Mike Hahn | Bartlett, KS 67332 | $103,997 |
58 | Baugher Farms Inc | Parsons, KS 67357 | $102,779 |
59 | Ken D Graves | Bartlett, KS 67332 | $101,768 |
60 | Dan Manners Farms LLC | Parsons, KS 67357 | $101,647 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”