Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Kansas
(Rep. Steve Watkins)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 10,123
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $71,262,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Roger R Draeger Revocable Trust | Galena, KS 66739 | $113,097 |
62 | Lone Elm Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $112,692 |
63 | Getman Brothers Farms LLC | Columbus, KS 66725 | $112,312 |
64 | A And V Manners Inc | Parsons, KS 67357 | $112,306 |
65 | Larmar Inc | Robinson, KS 66532 | $112,071 |
66 | Lisa Dawn Jackson | Chetopa, KS 67336 | $111,278 |
67 | Mccauley Inc | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $110,562 |
68 | River Valley Trucking And Excavating | Lacygne, KS 66040 | $108,588 |
69 | Dunlop Farms Inc | Parker, KS 66072 | $107,574 |
70 | Roberds Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $107,311 |
71 | Douglas L Brockhoff | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $107,151 |
72 | Kelby A Ostrander | Winchester, KS 66097 | $106,492 |
73 | 3f Farms LLC | Edna, KS 67342 | $105,942 |
74 | Jerome Troike | Walnut, KS 66780 | $104,877 |
75 | Roger W Meyer | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $104,464 |
76 | Sjdn Family Lacygne Farm LLC | Leawood, KS 66224 | $103,731 |
77 | Harold Woods Cattle Co | Girard, KS 66743 | $103,297 |
78 | Kem Idol Rev Trust - Kem Idol | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $102,721 |
79 | Kevin M Lane | Valley Falls, KS 66088 | $101,464 |
80 | Chris M Brown | Columbus, KS 66725 | $100,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”