Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Kansas
(Rep. Steve Watkins)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 10,123
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $71,262,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ken Martin | Cherokee, KS 66724 | $100,552 |
82 | Shaffer Agriculture Services LLC | Altamont, KS 67330 | $100,529 |
83 | Pioneer Stock Farm Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $99,177 |
84 | Van Underwood | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $98,450 |
85 | D & Z Crain Farms LLC | Columbus, KS 66725 | $97,640 |
86 | Wyatt Joseph Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $97,570 |
87 | Harrison L Idol Jr | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $97,032 |
88 | Triplett Grain LLC | Thayer, KS 66776 | $96,294 |
89 | Foster Dairy | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $96,238 |
90 | Jcb Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $96,126 |
91 | Max Oltjen Land & Cattle Co | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $96,098 |
92 | Curtis J Blevins | Robinson, KS 66532 | $93,742 |
93 | Jt Grain Inc | Walnut, KS 66780 | $93,525 |
94 | Menold Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $93,285 |
95 | David H Winters Sr | Mound Valley, KS 67354 | $93,179 |
96 | Siefker Farms Inc | Moran, KS 66755 | $92,940 |
97 | Tommie L Stirton | Horton, KS 66439 | $92,783 |
98 | Lin-lea Farms Inc | Mound City, KS 66056 | $92,527 |
99 | Howard Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $92,437 |
100 | Meiwes Farm | Iola, KS 66749 | $91,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”