Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 7,974

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $191,767,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
81Fenner Farms LLCParkville, MO 64152$223,490
82Marvin-f & Carol J Z ZimmermanHendersonville, TN 37075$223,375
83Martin Brothers InvestmentsHugoton, KS 67951$223,175
84Ambrose & T Ernzen Rev Lv TrustAtchison, KS 66002$223,116
85David J NachtigalHiawatha, KS 66434$222,402
86O'trimble Family Living Trust Dtd 3-16-94Perry, KS 66073$221,408
87Linda BearSaint Joseph, MO 64506$220,792
88Edward M Finger Rev Liv Trust - EPowhattan, KS 66527$220,501
89James E HigginsPrescott, KS 66767$220,332
90Jason B SpencerGarnett, KS 66032$219,390
91Marvin W And Barbara A Moore Rev Liv TrustMorrill, KS 66515$219,046
92Mark I GermannThe Villages, FL 32162$218,925
93Richard Dale MillerStanley, KS 66224$218,900
94John C Gross IIIFort Scott, KS 66701$218,190
95James W LewisYates Center, KS 66783$217,749
96Susan BatemanLawrence, KS 66044$217,055
97Frank L Albertini Rev TrustChetopa, KS 67336$216,572
98Burton J CrowellPittsburg, KS 66762$215,879
99James E LoweLouisburg, KS 66053$215,825
100Ronald F RiceWathena, KS 66090$213,231

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag