Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 13,029
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $169,520,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Fencepost Farms Inc | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $208,974 |
82 | Donald Van Jr & Sue L Koelliker T | Robinson, KS 66532 | $208,475 |
83 | Depoe Farms Inc | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $207,211 |
84 | Kem Idol Rev Trust - Kem Idol | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $206,091 |
85 | Terence M Reschke | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $203,401 |
86 | Harrison L Idol Jr | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $202,427 |
87 | Jerry Brant | Thayer, KS 66776 | $201,223 |
88 | Meech Brothers Farms | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $200,756 |
89 | Boos Farms Inc | Severance, KS 66087 | $200,521 |
90 | Scheckel Farms | Richmond, KS 66080 | $199,428 |
91 | Pine Ridge Inc | Morrill, KS 66515 | $199,123 |
92 | Korthanke Farms Inc | Robinson, KS 66532 | $194,685 |
93 | Robert L Mccauley | Leona, KS 66532 | $194,289 |
94 | Kramer Brothers | Iola, KS 66749 | $193,259 |
95 | Fowler Farms II LLC | Nortonville, KS 66060 | $192,841 |
96 | C Lloyd Crain Living Trust | Columbus, KS 66725 | $192,265 |
97 | S S & M Farms Inc | Colony, KS 66015 | $190,520 |
98 | Emanuel M Weber | Wathena, KS 66090 | $190,467 |
99 | Emery R Proper | Chanute, KS 66720 | $190,290 |
100 | M & O Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $189,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”