Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Kansas
(Rep. Steve Watkins)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 33,884
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $1,767,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Heinco Inc | Fairview, KS 66425 | $1,423,282 |
102 | James L Michael | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $1,421,942 |
103 | Marlin Fuhrman | Cummings, KS 66016 | $1,415,586 |
104 | Daniel J Kipper-kipper Living Trust | Richmond, KS 66080 | $1,400,714 |
105 | O'brien Rock Co Inc | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $1,372,640 |
106 | S S & M Farms Inc | Colony, KS 66015 | $1,367,564 |
107 | Albertson Farms Inc | Robinson, KS 66532 | $1,358,992 |
108 | Handke Farms Inc | Muscotah, KS 66058 | $1,356,563 |
109 | A & D Cox Farms Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $1,356,003 |
110 | Donnie K Brown | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $1,348,738 |
111 | Buffalo Hollow Farms Inc | Troy, KS 66087 | $1,347,489 |
112 | Ben Hinkle | Altamont, KS 67330 | $1,347,073 |
113 | Ken Martin | Cherokee, KS 66724 | $1,345,648 |
114 | Rst Farms Inc | Highland, KS 66035 | $1,330,465 |
115 | Junior Nelson Farms Inc | Troy, KS 66087 | $1,328,860 |
116 | Bodenhausen Farms Inc | Muscotah, KS 66058 | $1,328,728 |
117 | Van Underwood | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $1,325,353 |
118 | Henry Farms Of Brown County Inc | Robinson, KS 66532 | $1,322,309 |
119 | John W Reese III | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $1,314,403 |
120 | Dayton Covert | Robinson, KS 66532 | $1,311,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”