Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 7,974

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $191,767,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Dennis RuhnkeTroy, KS 66087$195,656
122Richard A And Myrna M Seyfert Living TrustChetopa, KS 67336$194,725
123Max Oltjen Land & Cattle CoHiawatha, KS 66434$194,649
124Dollene GuderMoran, KS 66755$193,958
125Regina M O'brien Revocable TrustSaint Paul, KS 66771$193,534
126Patrick J SvobodaBucyrus, KS 66013$193,111
127Marvin SabbertSaint Joseph, MO 64506$192,716
128Eldon GlennLiberty, MO 64068$192,533
129Alvin R WengerPowhattan, KS 66527$192,430
130Frank R CrystalFort Scott, KS 66701$192,129
131Buckbrush Farm C/o Matt IdaFort Scott, KS 66701$192,033
132Keith R BeemanHumboldt, KS 66748$192,012
133George Holt & Esther Holt Revocable TrustUniontown, KS 66779$190,263
134Janet S MimbsPompano Beach, FL 33062$189,964
135Norma BearWathena, KS 66090$188,027
136Michael SpencerColony, KS 66015$187,746
137Ray Gene TrothPleasanton, KS 66075$187,557
138Col Rick ClabaughSan Antonio, TX 78260$186,872
139Carl F MauersbergerWetmore, KS 66550$186,498
140Ronald L CunninghamWelda, KS 66091$186,064

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag