Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 7,974

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $191,767,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
141Edwin McgrewCenterville, KS 66014$184,462
142Larry Dieker IncWestphalia, KS 66093$183,657
143Robert A LowePrescott, KS 66767$183,212
144The Robinson TrustBlue Mound, KS 66010$183,105
145Angela K KreiderHorton, KS 66439$182,983
146William Daniel WebsterWhiting, KS 66552$182,838
147Loren L ToddPittsburg, KS 66762$181,164
148David E UngeheuerCenterville, KS 66014$180,220
149Steve HigginsHighland, KS 66035$179,825
150Quarter N Land & Cattle LLCHiawatha, KS 66434$178,488
151The Godfrey Family TrustBendena, KS 66008$178,400
152Lickteig Family Farms, LLCGreeley, KS 66033$177,898
153Hilma D Ungeheuer TrustCenterville, KS 66014$177,437
154Darrell Roy Monfort And KathleenIola, KS 66749$177,153
155Seidl Farms L L CDe Soto, KS 66018$176,712
156Gerard L Weber And Martha A Weber U/t/a Dtd 9/10/0Princeton, KS 66078$176,473
157Mike WheelerMound City, KS 66056$176,104
158Arlan M ThompsonMeriden, KS 66512$175,808
159Twin Cc Farms LLCMerriam, KS 66203$174,983
160Lylin CowanGirard, KS 66743$174,908

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag