Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 8,980

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $197,680,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
141Ray Gene TrothPleasanton, KS 66075$187,557
142Col Rick ClabaughSan Antonio, TX 78260$186,872
143Carl F MauersbergerWetmore, KS 66550$186,498
144Ronald L CunninghamWelda, KS 66091$186,064
145Edwin McgrewCenterville, KS 66014$185,359
146Larry Dieker IncWestphalia, KS 66093$183,657
147The Robinson TrustBlue Mound, KS 66010$183,105
148Angela K KreiderHorton, KS 66439$182,983
149William Daniel WebsterWhiting, KS 66552$182,838
150Joe K LudlumUniontown, KS 66779$182,227
151Loren L ToddPittsburg, KS 66762$181,164
152Darrell Roy Monfort And KathleenIola, KS 66749$180,718
153David E UngeheuerCenterville, KS 66014$180,220
154Steve HigginsHighland, KS 66035$179,825
155Quarter N Land & Cattle LLCHiawatha, KS 66434$178,488
156The Godfrey Family TrustBendena, KS 66008$178,400
157Seidl Farms L L CDe Soto, KS 66018$178,079
158Lickteig Family Farms, LLCGreeley, KS 66033$177,898
159Hilma D Ungeheuer TrustCenterville, KS 66014$177,437
160Gerard L Weber And Martha A Weber U/t/a Dtd 9/10/0Princeton, KS 66078$176,473

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag