Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 17,773

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $270,326,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2023
161Meech Brothers FarmsFort Scott, KS 66701$220,180
162Emery R ProperChanute, KS 66720$219,740
163Vance L BeebeColony, KS 66015$218,771
164William ManvilleValley Falls, KS 66088$218,265
165Scott J NavinskeyAtchison, KS 66002$218,230
166Emanuel M WeberWathena, KS 66090$217,313
167Matthew D RichardChanute, KS 66720$216,615
168Ryan M PattonHiawatha, KS 66434$216,323
169William E MccauleyHiawatha, KS 66434$214,843
170Falkenstien Farms IncOswego, KS 67356$214,279
171Dwayne A BroylesBlue Mound, KS 66010$212,852
172Gregory A SmithCummings, KS 66016$212,422
173Randall R & Karon L West Living TrustColony, KS 66015$212,346
174Westagard Farms IncRichmond, KS 66080$211,907
175Joseph H And Frances Page Rev Living TrustPittsburg, KS 66762$210,306
176Mark BlackburnSaint Paul, KS 66771$210,152
177Edward E CassellChetopa, KS 67336$210,067
178Francis And Geneva Stich Living RChanute, KS 66720$209,758
179Edward Hageman Jr Revocable Living Trust - EdwardHiawatha, KS 66434$209,362
180John C HuttoGalena, KS 66739$208,735

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag