Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,557
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $113,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | N & K Cattle Company | Mound City, KS 66056 | $867,316 |
2 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $833,772 |
3 | Charles Duane Brown | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $522,482 |
4 | Ben Hinkle | Altamont, KS 67330 | $481,915 |
5 | O'brien Rock Co Inc | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $462,614 |
6 | J E Kimbell | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $401,343 |
7 | Ken D Graves | Bartlett, KS 67332 | $383,608 |
8 | Henry Eggers | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $379,838 |
9 | Ronald L Madron Rev Trust | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $368,119 |
10 | Mark Henry Myers | Mound Valley, KS 67354 | $363,825 |
11 | David Wayne Hinkle | Altamont, KS 67330 | $362,693 |
12 | Kenneth Whelan | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $344,494 |
13 | Harold Woods Cattle Co | Girard, KS 66743 | $338,745 |
14 | Judd Ranch Inc | Pomona, KS 66076 | $335,240 |
15 | Joey J O'brien | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $313,292 |
16 | Mike Hahn | Bartlett, KS 67332 | $312,260 |
17 | Les Mcghee | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $303,785 |
18 | Meiwes Farm | Iola, KS 66749 | $299,197 |
19 | Chris R Bole | Cherokee, KS 66724 | $296,788 |
20 | Freeman Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $289,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>