Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,774

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $191,016,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
21Alfred E And Virginia E Manners LParsons, KS 67357$374,243
22Larry RohrerWathena, KS 66090$371,208
23Jesse T RandallMound City, KS 66056$364,710
24Vern A KurthElsmore, KS 66732$362,408
25Walter W ClarkOskaloosa, KS 66066$353,603
26Rickey L HladkyBerryton, KS 66409$353,325
27Timothy R BeckerLancaster, KS 66041$349,962
28Victor ClarkCenterville, KS 66014$341,427
29Marihta Gobl RutherfordArma, KS 66712$340,527
30Olive BrungardtErie, KS 66733$331,255
31Lyle ShattuckPrescott, KS 66767$324,103
32Dale AveryPleasanton, KS 66075$323,318
33Mitchell Family Trust 12-14-99Blue Mound, KS 66010$320,524
34P Kent SymnsAtchison, KS 66002$313,133
35Eldon T Johnston Jr Revocable Trust AgreementSebastian, FL 32958$307,955
36George Wm MeyerOskaloosa, KS 66066$302,997
37Bahr Brothers Farm PtrshipGermantown, WI 53022$300,804
38George R SwaneyHolton, KS 66436$298,817
39Rawhide Camp LLCHighland, KS 66035$298,621
40Byers FarmMound City, MO 64470$297,990

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag