Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29,419
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $1,276,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $4,152,918 |
2 | Burkdoll Brothers Inc | Rantoul, KS 66079 | $2,856,084 |
3 | William E Segebartt | Hepler, KS 66746 | $2,576,992 |
4 | Caldwell Farms Inc | Garnett, KS 66032 | $2,384,412 |
5 | Wille Farms Inc | Piqua, KS 66761 | $2,299,665 |
6 | Sundstrom Farms Inc | Ottawa, KS 66067 | $2,257,313 |
7 | Dunlop Farms Inc | Parker, KS 66072 | $2,205,377 |
8 | Epler Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $2,136,790 |
9 | Menold Bros Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $2,128,477 |
10 | Howard Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $2,098,531 |
11 | Bryan Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $2,051,573 |
12 | Jerome Troike | Walnut, KS 66780 | $2,021,550 |
13 | Baugher Farms Inc | Parsons, KS 67357 | $1,952,686 |
14 | Siefker Farms Inc | Moran, KS 66755 | $1,934,787 |
15 | Jessee Grain | Columbus, KS 66725 | $1,920,223 |
16 | Roberds Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $1,919,950 |
17 | R & D Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,914,869 |
18 | Schultz Brothers Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $1,888,781 |
19 | Jacobsen Farms LLC | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,852,682 |
20 | Gregory D Lair | Piqua, KS 66761 | $1,815,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>