Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,726

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $82,844,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21Short Farms IncOxford, KS 67119$260,613
22Mable E DavisSouth Hutchinson, KS 67505$260,081
23Lohrding 3 Bar Ranch IncColdwater, KS 67029$254,745
24Sandra Lee BellSpringfield, MO 65804$250,933
25Ralph L Arnet Revocable Trust-ralph L ArnetWaldron, KS 67150$249,909
26Short Land Company LLCOxford, KS 67119$242,826
27C Dean BertholfAnthony, KS 67003$241,443
28Daum-comanche CorporationHutchinson, KS 67504$241,000
29Dennis BarkerAttica, KS 67009$239,791
30Rick E Chitwood & Margareta I Chitwood Liv TrMayfield, KS 67103$239,018
31Dennis L Albright And Marilyn S Albright Liv TrAttica, KS 67009$235,947
32Harold HughbanksAttica, KS 67009$233,720
33Scott M Circle Living TrustMulvane, KS 67110$230,815
34Rush Creek LLCAnthony, KS 67003$227,176
35George Herrmann Revocable TrustFord, KS 67842$226,503
36Sonkabob IncAnthony, KS 67003$224,485
37Charles - Inslee Liv M InsleeSharon, KS 67138$224,238
38David CaryColdwater, KS 67029$224,213
39Steven Ray HollandErick, OK 73645$224,154
40James D ThompsonColdwater, KS 67029$220,839

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag