Production Flexibility Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 9,102

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $154,495,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41Bob H Mcdaniel TrustAttica, KS 67009$205,513
42Gene TurekSouth Haven, KS 67140$205,392
43Lester C Priest - Rev TrustWinfield, KS 67156$203,014
44Thomas S MortonOxford, KS 67119$201,904
45Larry H Stewart Living Trust-larry StewartHarper, KS 67058$201,737
46Ronald D Frazier Rev TrustCaldwell, KS 67022$199,402
47John B Forester Living TrustKiowa, KS 67070$198,487
48Mark D Schrock TrustHazelton, KS 67061$197,520
49Dalbom & Sons IncConway Springs, KS 67031$195,054
50Harold E Hartman TrustConway Springs, KS 67031$193,632
51Larry C ParkerMulvane, KS 67110$193,097
52Sam SpicerHazelton, KS 67061$191,584
53David R WedmanDanville, KS 67036$191,422
54Patterson & Patterson PtrAnthony, KS 67003$191,196
55Timothy W IsaacsWellington, KS 67152$190,343
56Delores Mcdaniel TrustSanger, TX 76266$189,704
57C And F Williams IncAnthony, KS 67003$188,513
58Charles L TylerCaldwell, KS 67022$188,400
59Rick E Chitwood & Margareta I Chitwood Liv TrMayfield, KS 67103$188,343
60Robert R Schrock Trust No 1Kiowa, KS 67070$187,984

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag