Market Gains in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 445
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $2,412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jay Rinehart | South Haven, KS 67140 | $8,057 |
82 | Donald B Applegate | Wellington, KS 67152 | $8,012 |
83 | Frank E Hargett | Anthony, KS 67003 | $7,982 |
84 | Beatrice Mary Drouhard Estate | Mead, CO 80542 | $7,854 |
85 | Amy Shoffner | Caldwell, KS 67022 | $7,772 |
86 | Jim & Janet Donley Trust | Oxford, KS 67119 | $7,742 |
87 | Naffziger & Ediger Farms | Harper, KS 67058 | $7,739 |
88 | Robert L Perry | Anthony, KS 67003 | $7,736 |
89 | Har El Acres Inc | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $7,700 |
90 | Michael J Neises | Belle Plaine, KS 67013 | $7,503 |
91 | Delane Woolfolk | Woodward, OK 73801 | $7,474 |
92 | Jehm | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $7,342 |
93 | Wheatridge Inc | Freeport, KS 67049 | $7,300 |
94 | William M Middleton | Oxford, KS 67119 | $7,279 |
95 | Casey Woner | Rock, KS 67131 | $7,109 |
96 | Lorie J Applegate | Belle Plaine, KS 67013 | $7,105 |
97 | Jerry Tretbar | Loyal, OK 73756 | $7,022 |
98 | Orie Marshall Love | Wellington, KS 67152 | $6,521 |
99 | Phil Schmidt Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $6,483 |
100 | Tim Rietzke | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $6,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”