Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 16,044

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $750,488,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
101Richard J BeckerWellington, KS 67152$871,724
102Smith Brothers D & RWinfield, KS 67156$866,081
103Robert D VoegeleArkansas City, KS 67005$864,087
104Ronnie Neises TrustBelle Plaine, KS 67013$861,660
105David RobertsGeuda Springs, KS 67051$857,052
106Bibb & NighswongerColdwater, KS 67029$851,986
107Kyle D HughbanksAlva, OK 73717$850,792
108Douglas E HiskenBelle Plaine, KS 67013$849,483
109David HutchinsGeuda Springs, KS 67051$847,360
110Richard C NafzigerFreeport, KS 67049$847,296
111Dml Farms LLCBelle Plaine, KS 67013$839,108
112Jeffrey M ParsonsAnthony, KS 67003$837,764
113Larry H Stewart Living Trust-larry StewartHarper, KS 67058$837,056
114Matt CantrellKiowa, KS 67070$835,163
115Wade Alan MccorgaryArkansas City, KS 67005$835,139
116Charles D Timothy J Pauly Ptrn Dba C&t DairyConway Springs, KS 67031$834,645
117Brothers Dairy IncBurden, KS 67019$833,198
118Brian L BruceMilan, KS 67105$832,469
119Duane E NulikCaldwell, KS 67022$832,356
120David L Messenger TrustGeuda Springs, KS 67051$828,347

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag