Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,997
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $2,680,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mitch Urban | Wellington, KS 67152 | $5,022 |
122 | Robert Irvin Parsons | Burden, KS 67019 | $4,973 |
123 | Todd Herrington | Wellington, KS 67152 | $4,966 |
124 | Robert D Voegele | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $4,963 |
125 | Metz Farms Partnership | Oxford, KS 67119 | $4,896 |
126 | M & R Farms Inc | Rock, KS 67131 | $4,894 |
127 | Clinton B Shorter | Dexter, KS 67038 | $4,878 |
128 | John W Bossi | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $4,799 |
129 | Jake Van Allen | Clearwater, KS 67026 | $4,795 |
130 | Bryan D Rebold | Udall, KS 67146 | $4,758 |
131 | , | $4,730 | |
132 | Charles C Buss Revocable Trust | Oxford, KS 67119 | $4,652 |
133 | Ian M C Parker | Mulvane, KS 67110 | $4,627 |
134 | Lazy J O Farm & Ranch Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $4,604 |
135 | Eleanor Bair Rev Trust | Burden, KS 67019 | $4,561 |
136 | Joseph P Hamilton | Belle Plaine, KS 67013 | $4,469 |
137 | Branscum Ranch LLC | Cambridge, KS 67023 | $4,453 |
138 | Rusk Farms Inc | Wellington, KS 67152 | $4,342 |
139 | John Blankenship - John & Shirley Blankenship Jt R | Udall, KS 67146 | $4,310 |
140 | Aas Oil Co Inc | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $4,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”