Market Gains in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 445
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $2,412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Max Murrow | Bluff City, KS 67018 | $4,900 |
122 | Pauline Miller Loving Trust | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $4,900 |
123 | Ted G Terwort | Disney, OK 74340 | $4,882 |
124 | Smith Family Loving Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $4,861 |
125 | Heimerman Farms | Peck, KS 67120 | $4,839 |
126 | Greg Vanderree | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $4,832 |
127 | Miller Cattle Company | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $4,812 |
128 | Ronald M Cooley | Winfield, KS 67156 | $4,789 |
129 | Vernon L Hibbard And Elizabeth A Hibbard Liv Tr | Harper, KS 67058 | $4,738 |
130 | Walters Farm LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $4,650 |
131 | Ronald R Wheeler | Wellington, KS 67152 | $4,567 |
132 | David Kleier | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $4,530 |
133 | Cox Farms Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $4,524 |
134 | Harold Lohmann | Alva, OK 73717 | $4,518 |
135 | Calvin E Boyd Revocable Trust | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $4,506 |
136 | Theurer Family Rev Trust | Wellington, KS 67152 | $4,466 |
137 | Angela Irons | Edmond, OK 73013 | $4,433 |
138 | Tom Wallrabenstein | Winfield, KS 67156 | $4,397 |
139 | David E Bowman | Rock, KS 67131 | $4,343 |
140 | Stanley L Ast | Mayfield, KS 67103 | $4,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”