Direct Payment Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 9,962

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $197,305,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2023
141Thomas MitchellSouth Haven, KS 67140$228,240
142Mott Revocable TrustKiowa, KS 67070$227,689
143Richard E ByersSouth Haven, KS 67140$226,949
144Leysa DielKiowa, KS 67070$226,198
145Norman L & Carole L Christenson Living TrustWinfield, KS 67156$224,905
146Robert ZekaWellington, KS 67152$224,710
147Michael L NewsumHarper, KS 67058$224,119
148De Wayne GerlachPeck, KS 67120$223,740
149Cattleco IncKiowa, KS 67070$223,192
150Steven P SchmidtCaldwell, KS 67022$223,060
151Kenneth E Bergman- Kenneth E Bergman And Carol J BHarper, KS 67058$221,940
152Brian E PriestWinfield, KS 67156$221,231
153Brian Lee ByersSouth Haven, KS 67140$219,742
154Casey WonerRock, KS 67131$219,371
155John W BossiArkansas City, KS 67005$219,109
156Joe L & Mary M Slechta Rev TrustConway Springs, KS 67031$218,708
157David J Seiwert Rev TrustConway Springs, KS 67031$217,587
158Douglas-douglas Rose & Mary Rose Rev Tr A RoseKiowa, KS 67070$217,399
159John P HarperBluff City, KS 67018$217,186
160Lindley ZimmermanBelle Plaine, KS 67013$216,924

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag