Total Subsidies in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 17,585

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $1,028,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Larry C ParkerMulvane, KS 67110$1,696,494
22Cox Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,686,300
23Norman L & Carole L Christenson Living TrustWinfield, KS 67156$1,685,573
24Rusk Farms IncWellington, KS 67152$1,683,240
25Timothy W IsaacsWellington, KS 67152$1,678,866
26Steven P SchmidtCaldwell, KS 67022$1,622,350
27John B Forester Living TrustKiowa, KS 67070$1,614,844
28Curtis And Bobbie Hostetler Trust-curtis HostetlerHarper, KS 67058$1,612,937
29Michael L VolavkaCaldwell, KS 67022$1,598,242
30Clark Wayne Thom - Clark W Thom Living TrustIsabel, KS 67065$1,579,416
31Joe H Neises Revocable TrustGeuda Springs, KS 67051$1,563,262
32Thom Land And Cattle Co IncMedicine Lodge, KS 67104$1,558,832
332b Farms LLCKiowa, KS 67070$1,556,170
34Steffen Farms PartnershipConway Springs, KS 67031$1,550,498
35Danny ShoffnerCaldwell, KS 67022$1,540,594
36Rodney D McdanielSharon, KS 67138$1,528,647
37C & C FarmsAnthony, KS 67003$1,526,141
38D E A Williams IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,523,417
39Mark D Schrock TrustHazelton, KS 67061$1,509,317
40Seeliger Farms IncBurden, KS 67019$1,500,755

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag