Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,622

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $81,390,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21Mable E DavisSouth Hutchinson, KS 67505$260,081
22Lohrding 3 Bar Ranch IncColdwater, KS 67029$254,745
23Sylvia Hanna-russellHouston, TX 77046$251,269
24Ralph L Arnet Revocable Trust-ralph L ArnetWaldron, KS 67150$245,289
25C Dean BertholfAnthony, KS 67003$241,443
26Daum-comanche CorporationHutchinson, KS 67504$241,000
27Dennis L Albright And Marilyn S Albright Liv TrAttica, KS 67009$235,947
28Sandra Lee BellSpringfield, MO 65804$233,347
29Dennis BarkerAttica, KS 67009$232,473
30Rick E Chitwood & Margareta I Chitwood Liv TrMayfield, KS 67103$230,905
31Scott M Circle Living TrustMulvane, KS 67110$230,815
32Harold HughbanksAttica, KS 67009$227,842
33Rush Creek LLCAnthony, KS 67003$227,176
34George Herrmann Revocable TrustFord, KS 67842$226,503
35Sonkabob IncAnthony, KS 67003$224,485
36Charles - Inslee Liv M InsleeSharon, KS 67138$224,238
37David CaryColdwater, KS 67029$224,213
38Steven Ray HollandErick, OK 73645$224,154
39James D ThompsonColdwater, KS 67029$220,839
40Short Land Company LLCOxford, KS 67119$217,212

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag