Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 16,044

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $750,488,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41C & C FarmsAnthony, KS 67003$1,142,864
42Gene TurekSouth Haven, KS 67140$1,136,681
43Michael SlackOxford, KS 67119$1,133,580
44Security State Bank **Scott City, KS 67871$1,129,955
45Rhonda J ParkerMulvane, KS 67110$1,119,659
46Curt HooblerMulvane, KS 67110$1,118,965
47Rusk Farms IncWellington, KS 67152$1,117,113
48Smith BrothersGeuda Springs, KS 67051$1,113,668
49Vincent HostetlerHarper, KS 67058$1,112,540
50JehmConway Springs, KS 67031$1,111,716
51Bruce E Rickard Trust Dated March 7, 2013-bruce ENashville, KS 67112$1,088,828
52Craig A Mease Revocable TrustNashville, KS 67112$1,087,165
53Thomas S MortonOxford, KS 67119$1,087,097
54Troy StrnadWellington, KS 67152$1,084,631
55Smith Brothers R&dWinfield, KS 67156$1,080,893
56Charles C Buss Revocable TrustOxford, KS 67119$1,077,101
57Curtis And Bobbie Hostetler Trust-curtis HostetlerHarper, KS 67058$1,069,300
58Golden Fields LLCConway Springs, KS 67031$1,069,074
59Ted A Rieckenberg TrustWellington, KS 67152$1,065,762
60Mike E ThompsonUdall, KS 67146$1,058,687

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag