Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 16,044

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $750,488,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Ray EnterprisesWinfield, KS 67156$4,052,855
2Har El Acres IncConway Springs, KS 67031$1,775,226
3Patterson & Patterson PtrAnthony, KS 67003$1,723,686
4Ternes Farms IncPeck, KS 67120$1,720,853
5Larry C ParkerMulvane, KS 67110$1,640,070
6J & M Ranch IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,619,683
7Metz Farms PartnershipOxford, KS 67119$1,615,524
8M & S Francis Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,569,843
9Randy Tracy Revocable TrustArgonia, KS 67004$1,521,260
10Francis Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,508,045
11Carothers Bros PtrAnthony, KS 67003$1,486,896
12Norman L & Carole L Christenson Living TrustWinfield, KS 67156$1,484,923
13Mcclung BrothersWinfield, KS 67156$1,439,962
14Tencleve Farms LLCWellington, KS 67152$1,423,069
15Heimerman FarmsPeck, KS 67120$1,415,301
16Campbell Farms LLCWinfield, KS 67156$1,410,851
17Clark Wayne Thom - Clark W Thom Living TrustIsabel, KS 67065$1,410,226
18Cox Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,392,269
19John B Forester Living TrustKiowa, KS 67070$1,385,971
20Timothy W IsaacsWellington, KS 67152$1,383,298

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag