Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Kenucky
(Rep. James Comer)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 9,213
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer) totaled $60,238,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William R Clift II And Tobatha Renee Clift | Princeton, KY 42445 | $118,039 |
62 | S & S Farm | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $117,446 |
63 | Lowell Dale Calender | Ledbetter, KY 42058 | $116,596 |
64 | David E Draper | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $115,061 |
65 | Deborah Draper | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $115,056 |
66 | Mitchell Farms | Clay, KY 42404 | $113,909 |
67 | Pirtle Farms Inc | Water Valley, KY 42085 | $110,841 |
68 | Teddy E Morgan | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $108,485 |
69 | Harper Farms | Clinton, KY 42031 | $107,636 |
70 | Lester Farms Inc | Gracey, KY 42232 | $105,720 |
71 | Pond Fork Farms | Sturgis, KY 42459 | $104,118 |
72 | Fps Farms | Murray, KY 42071 | $103,642 |
73 | Thomas R & Dorothy Larkins Trust | Clinton, KY 42031 | $102,395 |
74 | Rucker Farms | Pembroke, KY 42266 | $100,537 |
75 | Hunt Farms | Herndon, KY 42236 | $100,279 |
76 | Majo A LLC | Uniontown, KY 42461 | $99,324 |
77 | Kevin D Hayden | Mayfield, KY 42066 | $99,257 |
78 | 3 G Farms LLC | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $97,374 |
79 | Joshua Brashears | Cerulean, KY 42215 | $96,320 |
80 | Randy Deweese | Clinton, KY 42031 | $95,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”