Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 781

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer) totaled $36,696,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
81Mitchell Boys FarmsClay, KY 42404$132,499
82Clark Holdings LLC Dba Clark Farms Of KyHenderson, KY 42420$132,324
83B & T Farms LLCKevil, KY 42053$130,436
84George Andrew SpragueMorganfield, KY 42437$128,518
85White Oak Spring FarmsWaverly, KY 42462$128,074
86Lyle B Waller IIMorganfield, KY 42437$128,024
87Jerry M PeeryClinton, KY 42031$126,753
88Keith Harris Farms IncBenton, KY 42025$126,723
89Charles Amos WatsonPrinceton, KY 42445$126,020
90David ShouseMorganfield, KY 42437$124,989
91James Ray MurdockMurray, KY 42071$124,803
92Bradley D MintonHopkinsville, KY 42240$119,128
93John W SmithsonHopkinsville, KY 42240$116,429
94Roger C SmithsonHopkinsville, KY 42240$116,417
95David And Brenda JenkinsHopkinsville, KY 42240$116,164
96Elizabeth YoungHerndon, KY 42236$115,109
97Lynne DeweeseClinton, KY 42031$114,841
98Randy DeweeseClinton, KY 42031$114,841
99Chuck BuggMayfield, KY 42066$113,768
100L B Waller & Co A PartnershipMorganfield, KY 42437$112,897

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag