Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Kenucky (Rep. Brett Guthrie), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 483
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kenucky (Rep. Brett Guthrie) totaled $679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Garry Caswell | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $1,646 |
142 | Elwood Sydnor | Canmer, KY 42722 | $1,636 |
143 | Rupert Carby Jr | Sonora, KY 42776 | $1,634 |
144 | Lynn Hilan White | Louisville, KY 40216 | $1,627 |
145 | William Benock | Battletown, KY 40104 | $1,617 |
146 | Harold Ammons | Guston, KY 40142 | $1,617 |
147 | Winford T Smith | Cub Run, KY 42729 | $1,585 |
148 | James M Davis | Huff, KY 42210 | $1,582 |
149 | Marvin Adwell | Cave City, KY 42127 | $1,559 |
150 | Donald Sullivan | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,552 |
151 | Louis Crawford | Battletown, KY 40104 | $1,552 |
152 | David Davis | Brownsville, KY 42210 | $1,545 |
153 | Gene Smith | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,543 |
154 | Senate Duvall | Brownsville, KY 42210 | $1,539 |
155 | Leonard Buckner | Louisville, KY 40222 | $1,536 |
156 | George Waters | Horse Cave, KY 42749 | $1,533 |
157 | Kelsey Vincent | Brownsville, KY 42210 | $1,527 |
158 | Greg Logsdon | Upton, KY 42784 | $1,523 |
159 | Carlos Barbour | Canmer, KY 42722 | $1,501 |
160 | Clarice Myers | Battletown, KY 40104 | $1,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”