Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Kenucky (Rep. Brett Guthrie), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 243
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Kenucky (Rep. Brett Guthrie) totaled $2,706,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Paul Leslie Nash | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $2,744 |
182 | Nathan Neil Nash | Shepherdsville, KY 40165 | $2,743 |
183 | Roger D. Nash | Bee Spring, KY 42207 | $2,742 |
184 | Earl J Jaggers | Louisville, KY 40214 | $2,702 |
185 | Jeffery D Sole | Frankfort, KY 40601 | $2,633 |
186 | Sheeran's Farm Inc | Vine Grove, KY 40175 | $2,614 |
187 | Mike Dwyer | Caneyville, KY 42721 | $2,580 |
188 | Jonathan W Blanton | Caneyville, KY 42721 | $2,575 |
189 | Andrew C Dwyer | Roundhill, KY 42275 | $2,566 |
190 | Becky Riordan | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $2,499 |
191 | Paul Thomas | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $2,499 |
192 | Donald Dye | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $2,351 |
193 | Thomas Benock | Battletown, KY 40104 | $2,321 |
194 | Justin Baird | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $2,314 |
195 | Stephen Barr | Brandenburg, KY 40108 | $2,218 |
196 | Scott Gary | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $2,214 |
197 | Michael O Shockley | Canmer, KY 42722 | $2,173 |
198 | Harlin Tarter | Brownsville, KY 42210 | $1,967 |
199 | Eberhard K Kieslich | Battletown, KY 40104 | $1,886 |
200 | Darlia K Kessinger | Munfordville, KY 42765 | $1,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”