Conservation Reserve Program in 6th District of Kenucky (Rep. Andy Barr), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 148
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 6th District of Kenucky (Rep. Andy Barr) totaled $2,223,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Beaver Valley Farm LLC | Winchester, KY 40391 | $6,052 |
82 | Darrin Scott Allen | Cynthiana, KY 41031 | $5,764 |
83 | Omer Stokley | Winchester, KY 40391 | $5,704 |
84 | Edward C Stepanchuk | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,602 |
85 | Hacker Family Big Farm LLC | Winchester, KY 40391 | $5,476 |
86 | J Roger Jones III | Lexington, KY 40502 | $5,466 |
87 | Arthur M Walson | Winchester, KY 40391 | $5,322 |
88 | Danny Halcomb | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,212 |
89 | Dorothy K Saunders | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,125 |
90 | James E Gullette | Lexington, KY 40511 | $5,099 |
91 | Bennie H Childers | Winchester, KY 40391 | $5,015 |
92 | Ella Sharon Sexton | Camden, OH 45311 | $4,917 |
93 | Linda Parsons | Oxford, OH 45056 | $4,917 |
94 | Emerald Hills Farm | Winchester, KY 40391 | $4,704 |
95 | Bernie C Milam | Paris, KY 40361 | $4,514 |
96 | Mary Lila Cruse | Lexington, KY 40502 | $4,367 |
97 | Thomas J Bigstaff III | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,204 |
98 | Frank Pitts | Tucson, AZ 85739 | $4,143 |
99 | John Jenks | Winchester, KY 40391 | $4,111 |
100 | , | $4,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”