Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 252
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins) totaled $380,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | George Duhon | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $1,600 |
82 | Hardee Water | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $1,600 |
83 | Farrell J Woods | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $1,587 |
84 | Leo & Jeanette Thevis | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $1,570 |
85 | Kenneth J Broussard | Maurice, LA 70555 | $1,554 |
86 | Carl L Pesson | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $1,508 |
87 | Vermilion Parish School Board | Abbeville, LA 70511 | $1,470 |
88 | Gerald & Sharon Klumpp | Bell City, LA 70630 | $1,467 |
89 | Douglas C Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $1,457 |
90 | Patout Brothers | Jeanerette, LA 70544 | $1,455 |
91 | Bradley Holcomb | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $1,452 |
92 | Sederic Hebert | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $1,415 |
93 | Sheila M Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $1,411 |
94 | Bryan O Simon | Maurice, LA 70555 | $1,353 |
95 | A & M Farm Inc | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $1,353 |
96 | Shawn D Trahan | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $1,349 |
97 | Donald Guillotte Farms Inc | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $1,333 |
98 | Vollmer Brothers | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $1,323 |
99 | Sharon Klumpp | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $1,297 |
100 | Gerald J Klumpp | Lake Arthur, LA 70549 | $1,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”