Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 585
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins) totaled $1,670,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ruby Arceneaux | Bell City, LA 70630 | $4,817 |
82 | Dewey Domingues | Erath, LA 70533 | $4,815 |
83 | Phillip J Watkins | Welsh, LA 70591 | $4,591 |
84 | Randal Zaunbrecher | Lake Arthur, LA 70549 | $4,584 |
85 | Ludring Plaisance | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $4,492 |
86 | Benson J Langlinais | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $4,309 |
87 | Jade Timothy Trahan | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $4,152 |
88 | Glenn Simon | Morse, LA 70559 | $4,092 |
89 | Courtnie L Leblanc | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $4,024 |
90 | Crochet Planting LLC | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $3,837 |
91 | Wilson Boudreaux Jr | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $3,793 |
92 | Marceaux Farm | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $3,760 |
93 | Circle A Farm Inc | Maurice, LA 70555 | $3,693 |
94 | Wenceslaus Provost Jr | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $3,661 |
95 | Clay P Menard | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $3,580 |
96 | Durel J Romaine | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $3,543 |
97 | Gene A Constance | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $3,542 |
98 | Georgia A Constance | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $3,542 |
99 | Floyd Landry Jr | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $3,348 |
100 | Garner Lee | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $3,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”