Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 252
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Louisiana (Rep. Clay Higgins) totaled $380,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co LLC | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $10,500 |
2 | Progressive Land Corporation | Lafayette, LA 70505 | $9,100 |
3 | W C Lanie & Sons Inc | Jeanerette, LA 70544 | $8,500 |
4 | Edward J Vincent | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $7,500 |
5 | Noel Farms Inc | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $7,500 |
6 | 4 G Farms | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $7,340 |
7 | Northside Planting LLC | Franklin, LA 70538 | $7,151 |
8 | Ronald R Hebert Inc | Jeanerette, LA 70544 | $6,729 |
9 | Twin Pine Farms LLC | Jeanerette, LA 70544 | $5,137 |
10 | Thomas Earl Arceneaux | Bell City, LA 70630 | $4,725 |
11 | Arceneaux Farms Inc | Bell City, LA 70630 | $4,725 |
12 | John B Baker Estate | Lafayette, LA 70503 | $4,641 |
13 | Perrin J Arceneaux | Bell City, LA 70630 | $4,635 |
14 | Rosfeld Hebert Nickels | Lake Charles, LA 70605 | $4,626 |
15 | Joel Trahan | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $4,234 |
16 | Paul Maxie Breaux | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $3,960 |
17 | Craig Charles Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $3,854 |
18 | Pamela A Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $3,854 |
19 | Leo J Thevis | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $3,589 |
20 | Jeanette D Thevis | Gueydan, LA 70542 | $3,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>