Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,589

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $118,183,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
21Leake FarmsNewellton, LA 71357$431,621
22Hardwick Planting CoNewellton, LA 71357$415,809
23Dennis Farms PartnershipSondheimer, LA 71276$415,549
24Shariden Farms PartnershipTallulah, LA 71282$414,364
25Edward Reams FarmsSouth Fulton, TN 38257$411,567
26Wiggers Farm PartnershipFort Necessity, LA 71243$385,446
27Vandeven FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$375,054
28Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$370,168
29Dry Prong Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$369,339
30Oliver Farming PartnershipTallulah, LA 71282$364,036
31Franklin State Bank **Winnsboro, LA 71295$362,296
32Schenley Farm PtrshpMer Rouge, LA 71261$361,299
33G F & CFort Necessity, LA 71243$354,959
34Franklin FarmsNewellton, LA 71357$354,590
35Dba Miller Brothers Farm/ Randy Mark Becky GaylaEpps, LA 71237$349,930
36Mcmurry Gill PartnershipWinnsboro, LA 71295$347,170
37Jerry L Reeves JrWinnsboro, LA 71295$345,034
38Parker Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$340,460
39Erwin Farms PartnershipJena, LA 71342$339,827
40Taves Bayou PlantingLake Providence, LA 71254$328,759

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag