Direct Payment Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 12,532

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $581,982,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2023
21Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,608,238
22Mize FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$1,604,730
23Lakeland Planting CompanyFerriday, LA 71334$1,588,476
24Parker Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,588,235
25Mcdonald And McdonaldNewellton, LA 71357$1,556,717
26Jordan Planting Co IIOak Ridge, LA 71264$1,544,952
27K T Farms PartnershipWisner, LA 71378$1,490,307
28Turner Bros FarmsMer Rouge, LA 71261$1,489,086
29Shariden Farms PartnershipTallulah, LA 71282$1,486,706
30Jbf PartnershipTransylvania, LA 71286$1,462,087
313-b Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,409,420
32Barham Stevenson CoOak Ridge, LA 71264$1,385,649
33Shackelford Farms PtnBonita, LA 71223$1,381,563
34Red Gum Planting Co No 2Ferriday, LA 71334$1,350,100
35Owens Farming PartnershipOak Grove, LA 71263$1,315,687
36Morris Planting CompanyRayville, LA 71269$1,306,803
37Iii Finger Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,286,596
38Larche Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,278,458
39W-e Martin FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$1,270,160
40Black River GrainJonesville, LA 71343$1,254,341

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag