Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,420

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $27,830,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2023
41Wiggers Farm PartnershipFort Necessity, LA 71243$72,495
42Britt Keahey Farms PartnershipSaint Joseph, LA 71366$71,425
43Schenley Farm PtrshpMer Rouge, LA 71261$70,758
44W-e Martin FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$70,023
45Royd And Jerry Wiley FarmsJonesville, LA 71343$68,995
46Schneider Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$68,879
47Tom & Terri Cotton FarmJonesville, LA 71343$68,393
48Crigler PlantingSaint Joseph, LA 71366$67,242
49Nyanza Planting CompanyLake Providence, LA 71254$67,198
50Millikin Planting CompanyLake Providence, LA 71254$67,198
51Andy Barham FarmsOak Ridge, LA 71264$66,882
52Wood FarmsNatchez, MS 39120$65,175
53Little Creek FarmsMangham, LA 71259$64,636
54John Earl And Heather Carroll FarmsGilbert, LA 71336$64,594
55Russell Y Ratcliff Jr PtshpSaint Joseph, LA 71366$63,933
56Mer Rouge Farm PartnershipMer Rouge, LA 71261$63,437
57John Day Farms PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$63,422
58Taves Bayou PlantingLake Providence, LA 71254$62,574
59Larkin FarmsOak Ridge, LA 71264$61,623
60Ken And William Moroni FarmsSicily Island, LA 71368$60,884

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag