Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,479

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $65,948,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
41Brooks & Rachee Greer JvRayville, LA 71269$179,652
42Cross Keys Bank **Rayville, LA 71269$175,807
43C & C Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$173,779
44Edward & Gail Greer JvRayville, LA 71269$171,021
45Michael Brown & SonsLake Providence, LA 71254$170,004
46Tamarack Planting CoMonroe, LA 71202$167,280
47G & G Farms Of Gilbert IncGilbert, LA 71336$163,911
48Wiggers Farm PartnershipFort Necessity, LA 71243$163,612
49Bmh Farms PartnershipMonroe, LA 71203$162,745
50Williams FarmsDelhi, LA 71232$162,423
51Poverty Point Produce CoEpps, LA 71237$162,051
52Willie T FarmsMonroe, LA 71201$161,814
53W-e Martin FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$158,541
54Schneider Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$157,855
55Paul & Melissa Cater FarmsHarrisonburg, LA 71340$156,647
56Curt Collins FarmsTallulah, LA 71282$156,139
57Graham Farms PartnershipWinnsboro, LA 71295$155,490
58Denco Farms PartnershipTallulah, LA 71282$153,056
59Doodlebug Farms PartnershipMonroe, LA 71202$150,382
60Tensas Plantation IncFerriday, LA 71334$148,482

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag