Counter Cyclical Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 10,796

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $439,262,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2023
81Lensing & Harris PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$644,011
82John Day Farms PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$643,444
83Monticello FarmsWaterproof, LA 71375$631,672
84Britt Keahey FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$630,928
85Allen Crigler FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$629,972
86Nolan Clark FarmsMer Rouge, LA 71261$628,076
87Frogmore Farming PartnershipFrogmore, LA 71334$627,983
88Panola Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$622,753
89Mcphersons PartnershipAlexandria, LA 71306$618,860
90Cypress GroveNewellton, LA 71357$612,054
91Tom & Terri Cotton FarmJonesville, LA 71343$605,560
92K And B Planting CompanyNewellton, LA 71357$602,486
93Lee Farms PartnershipSaint Joseph, LA 71366$599,249
94Taves Bayou PlantingLake Providence, LA 71254$598,265
95Paul & Melissa Cater FarmsHarrisonburg, LA 71340$597,954
96Fortenberry Brothers Farm PartnerTallulah, LA 71282$593,281
97Ramco Rice CoMer Rouge, LA 71261$587,408
98Tamarack Planting CoMonroe, LA 71202$586,566
99M & H FarmsBastrop, LA 71220$585,724
100Robertine R Cobb Et AlRayville, LA 71269$582,232

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag