Water Bank Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 232
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $288,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Christian Life Fellowship | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $858 |
82 | Marshall Blackwell | Mangham, LA 71259 | $850 |
83 | Elizabeth C Smith | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $833 |
84 | Earl Carroll & Sons A Ptnsh | Gilbert, LA 71336 | $830 |
85 | S C Jackson | Jonesville, LA 71343 | $819 |
86 | E M Boothe | Harrisonburg, LA 71340 | $818 |
87 | Oran E Crockett | Columbia, LA 71418 | $803 |
88 | William G Avery Sr | Baton Rouge, LA 70809 | $800 |
89 | John C Gipson | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $793 |
90 | Eliza Lea Sharp | Natchez, MS 39120 | $788 |
91 | Mary Ann Sharp Trust | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $788 |
92 | Richard B Sharp Jr Trust | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $788 |
93 | Susan Amelia Sharp Trust | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $787 |
94 | Gordon Vaught | Jena, LA 71342 | $776 |
95 | James Ruddell Jr | Columbia, LA 71418 | $767 |
96 | Phil Nelson | Monroe, LA 71211 | $762 |
97 | Dewey Brown | Bastrop, LA 71221 | $762 |
98 | Ronnie Marsh | Monroe, LA 71203 | $762 |
99 | Truman Poole | West Monroe, LA 71291 | $761 |
100 | Sue C Avery | Baton Rouge, LA 70809 | $757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”