Market Loss Assistance Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,011
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $194,987,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Wilkerson Farms II | Newellton, LA 71357 | $522,504 |
| 22 | Ramco Rice Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $522,500 |
| 23 | A & B Partnership | Jones, LA 71250 | $521,318 |
| 24 | Jordan Planting Co II | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $513,096 |
| 25 | Parker Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $511,500 |
| 26 | Pardue Plantation Partnership | Mangham, LA 71259 | $504,325 |
| 27 | Barham Stevenson Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $496,045 |
| 28 | Iii Finger Farm Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $485,764 |
| 29 | East Lynn Planting Co | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $483,354 |
| 30 | Duval Partnership | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $466,668 |
| 31 | Big P Planting Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $463,814 |
| 32 | Vandeven Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $463,172 |
| 33 | Leake Farms | Newellton, LA 71357 | $451,896 |
| 34 | Stockland Planting Co | Tiptonville, TN 38079 | $448,940 |
| 35 | James E Gregory And Sons | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $427,324 |
| 36 | Ashly Plantation | El Dorado, AR 71731 | $420,455 |
| 37 | D & B Farms | Jones, LA 71250 | $414,299 |
| 38 | Therapy Field Farms | West Monroe, LA 71292 | $412,673 |
| 39 | Lost Ball Partnership | Sondheimer, LA 71276 | $393,493 |
| 40 | Jbf Partnership | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $390,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf