Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,878
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $21,515,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $52,178 |
22 | Big Bend Plantation Inc Of La | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $51,351 |
23 | Somerset Plantation | Newellton, LA 71357 | $50,390 |
24 | Martha Sanderson | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $50,000 |
25 | Patsy W Ruffin | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $50,000 |
26 | Alyssa B Oliver | Vicksburg, MS 39182 | $50,000 |
27 | Truman Poole | West Monroe, LA 71291 | $50,000 |
28 | Shelton Ruffin | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $50,000 |
29 | Ted E Oliver | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $50,000 |
30 | Thom Enterprises Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $50,000 |
31 | Duty Ferry Farm Inc | Monroe, LA 71211 | $50,000 |
32 | Janis B Burnside | Newellton, LA 71357 | $50,000 |
33 | The Teal Partnership L P | Monroe, LA 71201 | $50,000 |
34 | James M Mceacharn | Delhi, LA 71232 | $50,000 |
35 | Jon David Mceacharn | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $50,000 |
36 | Bird LLC | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $50,000 |
37 | Dickenhorst Farms Ltd | Whitefish, MT 59937 | $50,000 |
38 | Prince Farms Inc | Start, LA 71279 | $50,000 |
39 | Julia Clark | West Monroe, LA 71291 | $49,948 |
40 | Bret C Beard | Natchez, MS 39120 | $49,642 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”