Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 2019

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,288

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $137,555,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2019
21Red Gum Planting Co No 2Ferriday, LA 71334$790,009
22Tensas State Bank **Tallulah, LA 71284$714,606
23Jbf PartnershipTransylvania, LA 71286$648,926
24Capital One Bank **Plano, TX 75024$646,375
25Michael Brown & SonsLake Providence, LA 71254$600,766
26Balmoral Farming PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$599,435
27Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$577,648
28Perritt Farms PartnershipSaint Joseph, LA 71366$573,763
29Yates Farms PartnershipVidalia, LA 71373$572,488
30Stutts Bros Farm PartnershipBonita, LA 71223$544,876
31Maryland PlantationSaint Joseph, LA 71366$544,699
32Clark Farms Joint VentureMer Rouge, LA 71261$533,758
33Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$530,439
34Franklin FarmsNewellton, LA 71357$488,200
35Farm & Livestock Credit LLC **Newellton, LA 71357$483,697
36Franklin PartnershipRayville, LA 71269$481,258
37Vandeven FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$475,260
38Larche Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$474,105
39Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$466,784
40Doodlebug Farms PartnershipMonroe, LA 71202$463,736

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag