Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Massachusetts
(Rep. Richard Neal)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 253
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $13,424,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pine Island Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $1,409,080 |
2 | Fairfields Dairy Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $1,012,587 |
3 | Larkin Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $815,502 |
4 | Turner Farms Inc | South Egremont, MA 01258 | $705,162 |
5 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $603,925 |
6 | Louis T Aragi Sr | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $588,942 |
7 | Broadlawn Farm | Adams, MA 01220 | $533,713 |
8 | Robert C Kilmer Jr | Ashley Falls, MA 01222 | $387,860 |
9 | Twin River Farm LLC | Ashley Falls, MA 01222 | $355,451 |
10 | Chenail Brothers Dairy Farm | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $349,362 |
11 | Larkin - Batacchi Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $300,578 |
12 | George Beebe | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $300,012 |
13 | High Lawn Farm LLC | Lee, MA 01238 | $292,619 |
14 | Jayko Dairy | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $273,846 |
15 | Proctor's Bel Air Farm LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $261,704 |
16 | Gary M Shepard | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $251,975 |
17 | Howden Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $249,345 |
18 | Richard H Legeyt Toby Hill Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $195,613 |
19 | George W Noble Jr | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $187,547 |
20 | Mountain View Farm | Lanesboro, MA 01237 | $157,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>