Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Massachusetts
(Rep. Richard Neal)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 54
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $905,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Woven Roots Farm Inc | Tyringham, MA 01264 | $3,005 |
22 | Ioka Farm LLC | Hancock, MA 01237 | $2,973 |
23 | Elizabeth Keen | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,609 |
24 | , | $1,728 | |
25 | Windy Valley Limited Partnership | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $1,274 |
26 | Mark Meacham | Chester, MA 01011 | $1,256 |
27 | Itty Bitty Farm Trust | Windsor, MA 01270 | $1,084 |
28 | Darryl Lipinski Dba Sweet Brook Beef Company | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $972 |
29 | William Conklin | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $957 |
30 | Wendy Warner | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $929 |
31 | Many Forks Farm LLC | Clarksburg, MA 01247 | $803 |
32 | , | $750 | |
33 | Melissa Martin | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $689 |
34 | Cricket Creek Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $670 |
35 | , | $602 | |
36 | Andrew N Schmidt | Windsor, MA 01270 | $450 |
37 | , | $450 | |
38 | Baldwin Farm LLC | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $383 |
39 | , | $380 | |
40 | Gary Alibozek | Adams, MA 01220 | $374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”