Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $460,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard H Legeyt Toby Hill Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $5,368 |
22 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $5,159 |
23 | Jeffery Young | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $4,924 |
24 | Harold Shaw | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $4,466 |
25 | Leona Butler Farm | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $4,256 |
26 | Carolyn D Schoonmaker | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $4,024 |
27 | Judith R Brodeur | Canaan, CT 06018 | $3,263 |
28 | Shaw Farms LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,773 |
29 | Richard D Tryon | Monterey, MA 01245 | $2,614 |
30 | Proctor's Bel Air Farm LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,346 |
31 | Charles Garrity | Lanesboro, MA 01237 | $2,159 |
32 | Holiday Farm Inc. | Dalton, MA 01226 | $1,853 |
33 | Segalla Farm | Canaan, CT 06018 | $1,696 |
34 | Wilson Williams Co | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $1,549 |
35 | John W Springstube | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $1,520 |
36 | Charles Proctor | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $1,490 |
37 | Louis Brodeur | Canaan, CT 06018 | $1,231 |
38 | Sarah Hudson | Tyringham, MA 01264 | $1,019 |
39 | Brian Young | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $812 |
40 | Bruce Andrews | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”