Dairy Programs in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 62
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $4,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark F Warner | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $4,496 |
42 | Daniel E Galusha | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $4,191 |
43 | Broadlawn Farm | Adams, MA 01220 | $3,506 |
44 | Arthur G Brandon Jr | Adams, MA 01220 | $2,623 |
45 | Echo Farm | New Ashford, MA 01237 | $2,496 |
46 | Louis Brodeur | Canaan, CT 06018 | $2,487 |
47 | Bruce Andrews | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $2,235 |
48 | Michael Janowycz | Adams, MA 01220 | $2,235 |
49 | Richard Legeyt | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $2,219 |
50 | Charles E Slater Jr | Tyringham, MA 01264 | $1,972 |
51 | Harold Shaw | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $1,929 |
52 | Brian Young | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $1,725 |
53 | Rodger Field | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $970 |
54 | Edward L Drosehn | Peru, MA 01235 | $836 |
55 | George W Noble Jr | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $802 |
56 | Nicholas Hardcastle | Mill River, MA 01244 | $693 |
57 | Clifford A Sweet | Pownal, VT 05261 | $344 |
58 | Justin Jennings | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $262 |
59 | Charles Garrity III | Windsor, MA 01270 | $180 |
60 | Edward L Drosehn | Hinsdale, MA 01235 | $171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”