Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 115
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $1,885,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Alibozek | Adams, MA 01220 | $3,707 |
62 | Edwin Clairmont | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $3,620 |
63 | Leona Butler Farm | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $3,295 |
64 | Tobey Hill Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $3,190 |
65 | Wendy Warner | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $3,076 |
66 | Shaw Farms LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $3,060 |
67 | Echo Farm | Lanesboro, MA 01237 | $3,011 |
68 | Cricket Creek Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $2,959 |
69 | June A Ziegler | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $2,936 |
70 | Joseph Morey | Ashley Falls, MA 01222 | $2,788 |
71 | John W Springstube | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $2,531 |
72 | Robert A Coons | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,408 |
73 | Rudolph Annecharico Estate | Sandisfield, MA 01255 | $2,358 |
74 | Millbrook Farms | Hubbardsville, NY 13355 | $2,270 |
75 | Elmartin Farm | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $2,151 |
76 | Amy Musante | Dalton, MA 01226 | $2,050 |
77 | North Plain Farm LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $2,026 |
78 | , | $1,728 | |
79 | William Conklin | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $1,568 |
80 | Harold Shaw | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $1,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”