Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 82
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $1,236,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pine Island Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $221,152 |
| 2 | Larkin Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $71,372 |
| 3 | Whitney's Farm Market LLC | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $70,560 |
| 4 | Charles Wandrei Dba Jaeschke Frui | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $61,279 |
| 5 | Fairfields Dairy Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $61,087 |
| 6 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $56,846 |
| 7 | Turner Farms Inc | South Egremont, MA 01258 | $39,773 |
| 8 | Twin River Farm LLC | Ashley Falls, MA 01222 | $39,668 |
| 9 | Wahconah Street Greenhouse LLC | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $39,613 |
| 10 | Berkshire Wildflower Honey LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $38,426 |
| 11 | Broadlawn Farm | Adams, MA 01220 | $28,635 |
| 12 | Chenail Brothers Dairy Farm | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $25,469 |
| 13 | Caretaker Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $25,041 |
| 14 | Jaeschke's Orchard | Adams, MA 01220 | $24,610 |
| 15 | Woven Roots Farm Inc | Tyringham, MA 01264 | $23,037 |
| 16 | Windy Hill Farm Inc | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $21,285 |
| 17 | Jayko Dairy | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $20,175 |
| 18 | Ioka Valley Farm LLC | Hancock, MA 01237 | $20,033 |
| 19 | Elizabeth Keen | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $20,004 |
| 20 | Yokun Seat, Inc. | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $18,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
