Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Massachusetts
(Rep. Richard Neal)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 51
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $1,143,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Larkin Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $136,772 |
2 | Pine Island Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $134,381 |
3 | Fairfields Dairy Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $132,123 |
4 | Broadlawn Farm | Adams, MA 01220 | $82,953 |
5 | High Lawn Farm LLC | Lee, MA 01238 | $79,416 |
6 | Twin River Farm LLC | Ashley Falls, MA 01222 | $79,153 |
7 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $74,590 |
8 | Turner Farms Inc | South Egremont, MA 01258 | $74,040 |
9 | Chenail Brothers Dairy Farm | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $55,780 |
10 | Jayko Dairy | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $51,256 |
11 | Harley P. Phelps III Dba Echo Farm | New Ashford, MA 01237 | $41,608 |
12 | Tobey Hill Farm Partnership | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $30,814 |
13 | Gary M Shepard | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $26,451 |
14 | William T Tattersall | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $23,274 |
15 | Fred Havill | Tyringham, MA 01264 | $17,994 |
16 | John Gwozdz | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $17,174 |
17 | Michael J Weslowski Mountain View Farm | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $10,214 |
18 | Roger Duryea | Otis, MA 01253 | $7,576 |
19 | Richard N. Robert Dba Hinsdale Timbers | Dalton, MA 01226 | $6,544 |
20 | George Beebe | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $6,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>