Direct Payment Program in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $894,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Proctor's Bel Air Farm LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $18,939 |
22 | Gary M Shepard | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $14,412 |
23 | Maple Shade Farm Inc | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $12,850 |
24 | Ioka Farm LLC | Hancock, MA 01237 | $12,714 |
25 | Larkin - Batacchi Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $11,718 |
26 | Bruce Andrews | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $6,420 |
27 | Mt Williams Dairy | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $5,861 |
28 | Robert J Wirtes | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $5,342 |
29 | John W Springstube | West Stockbridge, MA 01266 | $4,610 |
30 | Leona Butler Farm | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $4,224 |
31 | Shaw Farms LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $3,917 |
32 | Berkshire Harvest | Lanesboro, MA 01237 | $3,364 |
33 | Whitney's Farm Market LLC | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $3,288 |
34 | Fronie Whitney | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $3,276 |
35 | Eric Whitney | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $3,223 |
36 | Thomas Touponce | South Lee, MA 01260 | $2,956 |
37 | Laurelbrook Farm LLC | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $2,700 |
38 | William Hoppe Jr | Richmond, MA 01254 | $2,563 |
39 | Wilson Williams Co | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $2,125 |
40 | Silvio V Rotti | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $1,967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”