Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $1,073,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Itty Bitty Farm Trust | Windsor, MA 01270 | $3,164 |
22 | Howden Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $2,884 |
23 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,462 |
24 | North Plain Farm LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $1,012 |
25 | Edwin Clairmont | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $975 |
26 | Kenneth W Smith Dba Trumpet Hill Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $951 |
27 | Windy Valley Limited Partnership | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $829 |
28 | Michael J Weslowski Mountain View Farm | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $822 |
29 | Darryl Lipinski Dba Sweet Brook Beef Company | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $756 |
30 | Berkshire Wildflower Honey LLC | Great Barrington, MA 01230 | $750 |
31 | Ioka Valley Farm LLC | Hancock, MA 01237 | $650 |
32 | Dan C Elliott | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $600 |
33 | Jeffrey Young | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $600 |
34 | David R Jurczak | Adams, MA 01220 | $450 |
35 | Timothy Michael Gallagher | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $448 |
36 | Elmartin Farm | Cheshire, MA 01225 | $405 |
37 | George W Noble Jr | Pittsfield, MA 01201 | $381 |
38 | Olsen Farm LLC | Lanesborough, MA 01237 | $287 |
39 | Brigitte Ruthman | Sandisfield, MA 01255 | $279 |
40 | Steven Jennings | New Ashford, MA 01237 | $275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”